230 lines
7.3 KiB
R
230 lines
7.3 KiB
R
# BIN-PPI-Analysis.R
|
|
#
|
|
# Purpose: A Bioinformatics Course:
|
|
# R code accompanying the BIN-PPI-Analysis unit.
|
|
#
|
|
# Version: 0.1
|
|
#
|
|
# Date: 2017 08 28
|
|
# Author: Boris Steipe (boris.steipe@utoronto.ca)
|
|
#
|
|
# Versions:
|
|
# 0.1 First code copied from 2016 material.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
# TODO:
|
|
#
|
|
#
|
|
# == DO NOT SIMPLY source() THIS FILE! =======================================
|
|
|
|
# If there are portions you don't understand, use R's help system, Google for an
|
|
# answer, or ask your instructor. Don't continue if you don't understand what's
|
|
# going on. That's not how it works ...
|
|
|
|
# ==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
# = 1 ___Section___
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ==============================================================================
|
|
# PART FOUR: EXPLORE FUNCTIONAL EDGES IN THE HUMAN PROTEOME
|
|
# ==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
# In order for you to explore some real, biological networks, I give you a
|
|
# dataframe of functional relationships of human proteins that I have downloaded from the
|
|
# STRING database. The full table has 8.5 million records, here is a subset of
|
|
# records with combined confidence scores > 980
|
|
|
|
# The selected set of edges with a confidence of > 980 is a dataframe with about
|
|
# 50,000 edges and 6,500 unique proteins. You can load the saved dataframe here
|
|
# (and also read more about what the numbers mean at
|
|
# http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15608232 ).
|
|
|
|
load("STRINGedges.RData")
|
|
|
|
head(STRINGedges)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# make a graph from this dataframe
|
|
?graph_from_data_frame
|
|
|
|
gSTR <- graph_from_data_frame(STRINGedges)
|
|
|
|
# CAUTION you DON'T want to plot a graph with 6,500 nodes and 50,000 edges -
|
|
# layout of such large graphs is possible, but requires specialized code. Google
|
|
# for <layout large graphs> if you are curious. Also, consider what one can
|
|
# really learn from plotting such a graph ...
|
|
|
|
# Of course simple computations on this graph are reasonably fast:
|
|
|
|
compSTR <- components(gSTR)
|
|
summary(compSTR) # our graph is fully connected!
|
|
|
|
dg <- degree(gSTR)
|
|
hist(log(dg), col="#FEE0AF")
|
|
# this actually does look rather scale-free
|
|
|
|
(freqRank <- table(dg))
|
|
plot(log10(as.numeric(names(freqRank)) + 1),
|
|
log10(as.numeric(freqRank)), type = "b",
|
|
pch = 21, bg = "#FEE0AF",
|
|
xlab = "log(Rank)", ylab = "log(frequency)",
|
|
main = "6,500 nodes from the human functional interaction network")
|
|
|
|
# This looks very scale-free indeed.
|
|
#
|
|
# Now explore some more:
|
|
|
|
# === CLIQUES ========
|
|
# Let's find the largest cliques. Remember: a clique is a fully connected
|
|
# subgraph, i.e. a subgraph in which every node is connected to every other.
|
|
# Biological complexes often appear as cliques in interaction graphs.
|
|
|
|
clique_num(gSTR)
|
|
# The largest clique has 63 members.
|
|
|
|
largest_cliques(gSTR)[[1]]
|
|
|
|
# Pick one of the proteins and find out what this fully connected cluster of 63
|
|
# proteins is (you can simply Google for the ID). Is this expected?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# === BETWEENNESS CENTRALITY =======================================
|
|
|
|
# Let's find the nodes with the 10 - highest betweenness centralities.
|
|
#
|
|
BC <- centr_betw(gSTR)
|
|
|
|
# remember: BC$res contains the results
|
|
head(BC$res)
|
|
|
|
BC$res[1] # betweeness centrality of node 1 in the graph ...
|
|
# ... which one is node 1?
|
|
V(gSTR)[1]
|
|
|
|
# to get the ten-highest nodes, we simply label the elements BC with their
|
|
# index ...
|
|
names(BC$res) <- as.character(1:length(BC$res))
|
|
|
|
# ... and then we sort:
|
|
sBC <- sort(BC$res, decreasing = TRUE)
|
|
head(sBC)
|
|
|
|
# This ordered vector means: node 3,862 has the highest betweeness centrality,
|
|
# node 1,720 has the second highest.. etc.
|
|
|
|
BCsel <- as.numeric(names(sBC)[1:10])
|
|
BCsel
|
|
# We can use the first ten labels to subset the nodes in gSTR and fetch the
|
|
# IDs...
|
|
ENSPsel <- names(V(gSTR)[BCsel])
|
|
|
|
# We are going to use these IDs to produce some output for you to print out and
|
|
# bring to class, so I need you to personalize ENSPsel with the following
|
|
# two lines of code:
|
|
set.seed(myStudentNumber)
|
|
ENSPsel <- sample(ENSPsel)
|
|
|
|
# We also need to remove the string "9606." from the ID:
|
|
ENSPsel <- gsub("9606\\.", "", ENSPsel)
|
|
|
|
# This is the final vector of IDs.:
|
|
ENSPsel
|
|
|
|
# Could you define in a short answer quiz what these IDs are? And what their
|
|
# biological significance is? I'm probably not going to ask you to that on the
|
|
# quiz, but I expect you to be able to.
|
|
|
|
# Next, to find what these proteins are...
|
|
|
|
# We could now Google for all of these IDs to learn more about them. But really,
|
|
# googling for IDs one after the other, that would be lame. Let's instead use
|
|
# the very, very useful biomaRt package to translate these Ensemble IDs into
|
|
# gene symbols.
|
|
|
|
# == biomaRt =========================================================
|
|
|
|
# IDs are just labels, but for _bio_informatics we need to learn more about the
|
|
# biological function of the genes or proteins that we retrieve via graph data
|
|
# mining. biomaRt is the tool of choice. It's a package distributed by the
|
|
# bioconductor project. This here is not a biomaRt tutorial (that's for another
|
|
# day), simply a few lines of sample code to get you started on the specific use
|
|
# case of retrieving descriptions for ensembl protein IDs.
|
|
|
|
if (!require(biomaRt)) {
|
|
source("http://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R")
|
|
biocLite("biomaRt")
|
|
library("biomaRt")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# define which dataset to use ...
|
|
myMart <- useMart("ensembl", dataset="hsapiens_gene_ensembl")
|
|
|
|
# what filters are defined?
|
|
filters <- listFilters(myMart)
|
|
filters
|
|
|
|
# and what attributes can we filter for?
|
|
attributes <- listAttributes(myMart)
|
|
attributes
|
|
|
|
# Soooo many options - let's look for the correct name of filters that are
|
|
# useful for ENSP IDs ...
|
|
filters[grep("ENSP", filters$description), ]
|
|
|
|
# ... and the correct attribute names for gene symbols and descriptions ...
|
|
attributes[grep("symbol", attributes$description, ignore.case=TRUE), ]
|
|
attributes[grep("description", attributes$description, ignore.case=TRUE), ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ... so we can put this together: here is a syntax example:
|
|
getBM(filters = "ensembl_peptide_id",
|
|
attributes = c("hgnc_symbol",
|
|
"wikigene_description",
|
|
"interpro_description",
|
|
"phenotype_description"),
|
|
values = "ENSP00000000442",
|
|
mart = myMart)
|
|
|
|
# A simple loop will now get us the information for our 10 most central genes
|
|
# from the human subset of STRING.
|
|
|
|
CPdefs <- list() # Since we don't know how many matches one of our queries
|
|
# will return, we'll put the result dataframes into a list.
|
|
|
|
for (ID in ENSPsel) {
|
|
CPdefs[[ID]] <- getBM(filters = "ensembl_peptide_id",
|
|
attributes = c("hgnc_symbol",
|
|
"wikigene_description",
|
|
"interpro_description",
|
|
"phenotype_description"),
|
|
values = ID,
|
|
mart = myMart)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# So what are the proteins with the ten highest betweenness centralities?
|
|
# ... are you surprised? (I am! Really.)
|
|
|
|
# Final task: Write a loop that will go through your list and
|
|
# for each ID:
|
|
# -- print the ID,
|
|
# -- print the first row's symbol, and
|
|
# -- print the first row's wikigene description.
|
|
#
|
|
# (Hint, you can structure your loop in the same way as the loop that
|
|
# created CPdefs. )
|
|
|
|
# Print the R code for your loop and its output for the ten genes onto a sheet
|
|
# of paper, write your student number and name on it, and bring this to class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
# = 1 Tasks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# [END]
|